One area where Atom's tool excels, though, is in its support for diff3 style conflict markup. It's rudimentary, but serviceable for minor fixup: When a file with conflict markup is loaded, it will overlay some styling and context options directly onto the text markup. I guess just as a data point, though not a hugely relevant one, Github's Atom text editor provides a conflict-resolution tool integrated into its editor panes. It's just something that would be Nice To Have™.Ĭloser-consumption avoidance in the Github Atom editor None really, I guess just continue to eat the closer in the merge tool view? It's not the end of the world if nothing changes, which is why I marked this a feature request rather than a bug. It continues to eat the closer of those two changes.įor better management and interleaving of edits during conflict resolution, it would be extremely valuable if Sublime Merge were to take a diff3-style (or perhaps even directly diff3-driven) approach to edit conflicts that avoids eating the closer. Unfortunately, even if a repo is configured for nflictStrategy=diff3, the conflict resolution view of Sublime Merge is unaffected. Upgraded to InstallAnywhere 2010 - improved installers and application launchers. Upgraded to JavaHelp 2 - improved search and performance. Bugs 412-417 fixed (Refer to BugReports on Guiffy's web site for details). Upgraded Quaqua FileChooser for latest Snow Leopard LAF on MacOS X. As I noted, the default conflict strategy applied by git merge will insert conflict markers in exactly the same configuration used by Sublime Merge: There's a fair argument to be made here that this is really Git's problem. Properly managing the conflict requires that blocks of edited lines be kept intact, so that they remain syntactically valid. Pre-resolving only part of these conflicting edits means that if the user were to include both sides' changes in the merge, the result would be a combined file that's missing a closing tag. However, Ritcher makes a very compelling argument for why this is the wrong approach to resolving a conflict like this. In fact, it's exactly how git merge itself treats the conflict, at least by default (more on that shortly). Since both commits made the same change there (inserted a ), that line is considered pre-resolved. Currently, Sublime Merge will bring up the conflict resolution view like so:Īs you can see, the last line has been trimmed off both sides. When the branches containing these two changes are merged, they will conflict and need to be resolved. + ĩ.3 Release Notes: Build 293 - September 1, 2010 + + Upgraded to InstallAnywhere 2010 - improved installers and application launchers. + Upgraded to JavaHelp 2 - improved search and performance. a/ReleaseNotes 9_4.html +++ b/ReleaseNotes 9_4.html -46,6 +46,10 Quaqua FileChooser for latest Snow Leopard LAF on MacOS X. Search Search for: Tags $http AngularJS API Arduino Artificial Intelligence Authentication AWS Bash bitcoin blockchain Bytedance Cloud computing co-working space command prompt compile COVID-19 CSS Database Deployment Didi Chuxing Dropbox e-commerce Facebook Gig economy Google Hardware Hardware start-up HTTP Client HTTP request IDE Innovation Internet Internet of Things Investment Java JavaScript Learning LiDAR Life Linux Machine learning Node.Diff -git a/ReleaseNotes 9_4.html b/ReleaseNotes 9_4.html If You’re So Smart, Why Aren’t You Rich?.MrBeast’s management company, Night Media, has a new venture fund that’s backed by creators.YouTube’s head of Gaming leaves to join blockchain group Polygon.We just found out how Musk may finance his $43B Twitter bid.Tumblr said 420 Blaze it (but literally).
0 kommentar(er)
